🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to erase African American heritage and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how little it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.